School Overview
  • USP-3
School Name :
University of Southern Philippines Foundation
Acronym :
USPF
School Type :
Private
Academic Calendar :
Bi-Semestral
Year Founded :
1927
Religious Affiliation :
nonsectarian
Hymn :
USPF Loyalty





How to contact the School?

Address : Salinas Drive, Lahug, Cebu City, Cebu 6000
Contact Number : 414 8773
Email : uspfimo@uspf.edu.ph
Website : http://www.uspf.edu.ph


School Summary

The University of Southern Philippines Foundation was founded by men and women who felt the need of establishing a private, non – sectarian educational institution that would offer relatively high standards of instruction within the reach of the average man in the community. These men and women were: Agustin Jereza, a civil engineer from the State University of Iowa; Virgilio Gonzales, a doctor of medicine from the University of the Philippines; Miguel Sanson, a practicing attorney; Mrs. Natividad Villa – Albino, a school teacher; Felipe Ouano, Fructuoso Ramos, and Hipolito Andrada, businessmen; and Dr. Jose Mirasol, a chemist and a former dean of the Cebu Junior College, then the Cebu branch of the University of the Philippines. Dr. Mirasol served as the first director of the school.

Professional Regulations Commission Statistics

Overall Performance :
This data shows PRC Board Rating Statistics
All Profession : 9999 - 0


How much is the Tuition Fee?

Bachelor's degree Php 40,000-50,000 per year
Master's degree Php 12,000-29,000 per year

Are Financial Aid and Scholarship avaiable?

University Of Southern Philippines Foundation is highly committed to provide academic excellence scholarships for incoming first year (senior high school graduates only) as following:

WITH HIGHEST HONOR (with General Average of 98-100)

The university offers full free tuition fee, including matriculation, laboratory and other fees except for the entrance fee at the beginning of the semester to honor graduate students With Highest Honor from any school regardless of the number of graduates for the first semester of enrollment only. WITH HIGH HONOR (with General Average of 95-97) The university offers 100% discount on tuition fee, and 50% on matriculation, laboratory and other fees to any graduate With High Honor of any school regardless of the number of graduates for the first semester of enrollment only.

WITH HONOR (with General Average of 90-94)

The university grants 75% discount on tuition fee, excluding matriculation, laboratory and other fees to any graduate With Honor regardless of the number of graduates of any school for the first semester of enrollment only. Scholarship for Cebu City Science High School Graduates
  • Graduates of Cebu City National Science High School are granted a 100% discount on tuition fee only, excluding matriculation, laboratory and other fees.
  • Graduates of other National Science High School enjoy a 50% tuition fee discount excluding matriculation, laboratory and other fees.
  • The scholarship is good only for one semester specifically during their first year. For the succeeding semesters, the scholar may apply either as university, college or departmental scholar, if he/she meets all the requirements.
  • He/She must carry the prescribed regular load (at least 18 units) of the course he/she is enrolled.
  • Violation of any rules and regulations of the school is a ground for expulsion from the program.


Education news: University of Southern Philippines Foundation

Get by: Mail RSS

Announcements

Published on 8:18 pm

Santo NiñoCebu CityJEREZASANCTUARYLegion DevoteesPOPULATIONCOUNTDOWNOrganization1010101010COUNTDOWN1010101010OBLONG ZEROShadow NukeSPACE CRAFTCOUNTDOWN1010101010OBLONG ZEROShadow NukeSPACE CRAFTCOUNTDOWN1010101010OBLONG ZEROShadow NukeSPACE CRAFTCOUNTDOWN1010101010OBLONG ZEROShadow NukeSPACE CRAFTCOUNTDOWN1010101010OBLONG ZEROShadow NukeSPACE CRAFTCOUNTDOWN1010101010OBLONG ZEROShadow NukeSPACE CRAFTCOUNTDOWN1010101010OBLONG ZEROShadow NukeSPACE CRAFTCOUNTDOWN1010101010OBLONG ZEROShadow NukeSPACE CRAFTCOUNTDOWN1010101010OBLONG ZEROShadow NukeSPACE CRAFTCOUNTDOWN1010101010OBLONG ZEROShadow NukeSPACE CRAFTSCOUNTDOWN1010101010Holy Scroll Maria Beatriz

October 13th

Santo Niño
Cebu City
JEREZA
SANCTUARY
Legion Devotees
POPULATION

COUNTDOWN
Organization
1010101010

COUNTDOWN
1010101010

OBLONG ZERO
Shadow Nuke
SPACE CRAFT
COUNTDOWN
1010101010

OBLONG ZERO
Shadow Nuke
SPACE CRAFT
COUNTDOWN
1010101010

OBLONG ZERO
Shadow Nuke
SPACE CRAFT
COUNTDOWN
1010101010

OBLONG ZERO
Shadow Nuke
SPACE CRAFT
COUNTDOWN
1010101010

OBLONG ZERO
Shadow Nuke
SPACE CRAFT
COUNTDOWN
1010101010

OBLONG ZERO
Shadow Nuke
SPACE CRAFT
COUNTDOWN
1010101010

OBLONG ZERO
Shadow Nuke
SPACE CRAFT
COUNTDOWN
1010101010

OBLONG ZERO
Shadow Nuke
SPACE CRAFT
COUNTDOWN
1010101010

OBLONG ZERO
Shadow Nuke
SPACE CRAFT
COUNTDOWN
1010101010

OBLONG ZERO
Shadow Nuke
SPACE CRAFTS
COUNTDOWN
1010101010

Holy Scroll Maria Beatriz : a said tale be the one will she and people fear : I didn't care the gift adverb said fear : there : a lifes bite also war I name tale : I taste fame those years : the opinionated home dare : after gifted sword while he or she dare : them : so much moonshine rise dear : the poetry said law : there and here : we were there : I population law : the people we the moon bite ark from hell : those nights and days dwell highness priest shall tale : the poem said law again at the plotted laws of his faith plays : might movement tale in a highness god gifted hell : the scrolling home house tale : I a name countdown god said her & I : gift my people will dare her highness girl : riddle? : point zero one percent countdown 1010101010 : countdown 1010101010 : RADARLOCKED :

Santo Niño
Cebu City
JEREZA
SANCTUARY
Devotees Legion
POPULATION
COUNTDOWN
Organization
1010101010
Evidences Files Done Scriptures
1010101010
1010101010
1010101010
1010101010
1010101010
1010101010
1010101010
1010101010
1010101010
1010101010

Allies Law Verdicted File Done Scriptures
1010101010

Territory Law Verdicted File Done Scriptures
1010101010

Territory Enemies Brain Thinks
Santo Niño
Cebu City
JEREZA
SANCTUARY
Legion Devotees
POPULATION
COUNTDOWN
Organization
HEAD
1010101010
Check Name
1010101010

Territory Enemies Brain Thinks
HEAD
Evidences Files Done Scriptures
1010101010
1010101010
1010101010
1010101010
1010101010
1010101010
1010101010
1010101010
1010101010
1010101010

The countdown organization : countdown 1010101010 : there : the territory laws in a verdict situated laws to another theory hidden war strategies : thus : I plotted war those given verdicts files check research systematic order : in a preparation of a countdown organization : there again theory some population thinking machines and reasonable justice system : a pressure order given time frame again : now : law populate war to contest laws of a people republic book realms : I disappear sometime reader dealings of a faithed ways again and again : law : it has a sword hunted by plotted ways order of a territorial debates : wished ally hounds a deleted book of people said ways of a santo niño and republic of a rebellion thinking movement and territory ruler ways a deleted shouted god's layers principle books : which means a laws and territory of a prayer temple santo niño : Brain Thinks Flag Zero Done Scriptures :

Santo Niño
Cebu City
JEREZA
SANCTUARY
Legion Devotees
POPULATION

COUNTDOWN
Organization
1010101010

COUNTDOWN
1010101010

OBLONG ZERO
Shadow Nuke
SPACE CRAFT
COUNTDOWN
OBLONG ZERO
Shadow Nuke
PARASITES
Nuke Robots
1010101010

OBLONG ZERO
Shadow Nuke
SPACE CRAFT
COUNTDOWN
OBLONG ZERO
Shadow Nuke
PARASITES
Nuke Robots
1010101010

OBLONG ZERO
Shadow Nuke
SPACE CRAFT
COUNTDOWN
OBLONG ZERO
Shadow Nuke
PARASITES
Nuke Robots
1010101010

OBLONG ZERO
Shadow Nuke
SPACE CRAFT
COUNTDOWN
OBLONG ZERO
Shadow Nuke
PARASITES
Nuke Robots
1010101010

OBLONG ZERO
Shadow Nuke
SPACE CRAFT
COUNTDOWN
OBLONG ZERO
Shadow Nuke
PARASITES
Nuke Robots
1010101010

OBLONG ZERO
Shadow Nuke
SPACE CRAFT
COUNTDOWN
OBLONG ZERO
Shadow nuke
PARASITES
Nuke Robots
1010101010

OBLONG ZERO
Shadow Nuke
SPACE CRAFT
COUNTDOWN
OBLONG ZERO
Shadow Nuke
PARASITES
Nuke Robots
1010101010

OBLONG ZERO
Shadow Nuke
SPACE CRAFT
COUNTDOWN
OBLONG ZERO
Shadow Nuke
PARASITES
Nuke Robots
1010101010

OBLONG ZERO
Shadow Nuke
SPACE CRAFT
COUNTDOWN
OBLONG ZERO
Shadow Nuke
PARASITES
Nuke Robots
1010101010

OBLONG ZERO
Shadow Nuke
SPACE CRAFTS
COUNTDOWN
OBLONG ZERO
Shadow Nuke
PARASITES
Nuke Robots
1010101010

The Point Zero One Percent Countdown : when a war weapon thinks : the ability to survive a trades manual historian book : ares : the name tame theory subtracted pool bite hug shire : when a population think : maria beatriz reason a head madre santo niño people worshiping art of destruction again : why? : tradition head madre law of santo niño threat a city people thinking of their methodology standardization laws of manual focused treaty war : might maria said law of santo niño versus said people of judgment : I now conclude a law of madres maria beatriz head santo niño law & EVERYBODY heads all people santo niño cebu city : that there is a nights & days of the city law : countdown 1010101010 :

The Point Zero One Percent Countdown 1010101010 : in a hundred percentage countdown review file check folder 1010101010 : the percentage counted a hidden waits of a plotted technology thinks : a thinking super computer earphones check plotted bites : that is the earphones thinking to a method writes against these manual thinks possibilities : now : the earphones thinking to a radarlocked situated red alert bitten book : THE EARPHONES THINK : Countdown 1010101010 :

Maria Beatriz : Tradition Head Madre Santo Niño : Allies! : hail allies of a beacon waits again and again : the head madre writing laws to a people santo writes a beacon codes treachery war again : a threat zero god fear a bitten prayer of a sanctuary people worshippers of a head madre maria beatriz : law readers of santo niño : law of the people created a bitten war to the enemies waits also : now threat zero god said : The Earphones Law : Countdown 1010101010 :
... See MoreSee Less

Published on 9:11 pm

Christian existentialism is a theo-philosophical movement which takes an existentialist approach to Christian theology. The school of thought is often traced back to the work of the Danish philosopher and theologian Søren Kierkegaard (1813–1855), who is considered the father of existentialism. Philosophy introduces us to the very essence of life. «Has science lost its love for wisdom?» They say human consciousness is higher, and do not fit nature. Man strives towards justice and meaning that cannot be achieved - and therefore humanity needs what nature cannot provide. Is it then natural to seek meaning beyond nature and rationality?

There are differences between thinkers that can be classified as existentialists, but still they all claim that reality is partly absurd; it cant be understood only with the use of reason, and that one therefore must use non-rational methods such as faith, feelings, intuition, desire, will, etc. The human inability to find intrinsic value – to seek a higher or deeper purpose in life – is the rational mind brought up believing were entirely rational beings. The absurdity in existence itself has no meaning, and we must learn to bear with it. That is simply because we are inexperienced. In the end it adds up to subjective truth – which cannot be directly understood. Indirect communication requires appropriation on the part of the receiver. The receiver must experience to understand. Or else it occurs as limitations within the language, leading to misunderstanding and people who criticize others for their own lack of understanding. Subjective truth is composed by introspection and experiences, not propositions or perceptions of the external world. History, science, and speculative philosophy – all deal with objective knowledge, which can be communicated directly and understood without experiencing personally what is being communicated. And for those entirely rational beings, actually they are living in denial. People operate using two separate systems for information processing: analytical-rational and intuitive-experiential. The analytical-rational system for information processing, is covered by the intuitive-experiential, which is fast, guided by emotion and past experience, requires little in terms of cognitive resources, it is especially equipped to handle the majority of information processing on a daily basis. Because you trust and believe in your intuition, it allows us to focus the limited capacity of our rational system on whatever requires our conscious attention at the time. And thats the very same thing as admitting to how false it is thinking we are entirely rational creatures. With that, your intuition is the typical compass. And often do we know what to do, but then dont do it. And thats simply being practical. Being practical is not the same thing as truth. Which means your intuition was giving you a sense of direction. Chess players depend on intuition. Magnus Carlsen says, it’s hard to explain, sometimes a move just feels right. Engaging in deliberate practice – we aren’t just accumulating factual knowledge. Instead, we’re embedding our experience into our unconscious, so that even insanely complicated calculations can be made possible. Intuition is an essential capacity for Genius. Experts are actually profoundly intuitive. When experts evaluate a situation, they dont deliberately evaluate all the available options or analyze all the relevant information. And in crisis situations, armed forces, police, fire brigade, hospitals, etc. The analytical-rational is primarily for the inexperienced. Most of us can develop an intuitive decision style by gaining experience. Lack of experience is the reason nothing ever is reasonable enough to some people. And now they are doing nothing else than encouraging others to think more rationally. Actually, people have been doing this for centuries, in contrast to a rational sense which are guiding people from the inside, enabling them to set a good example. 

While objective facts are important, there is a second and more crucial element of truth, which is to be found in subjectivity. Objective truth is that which relates to propositions, that which has no relation to the existence of the knower. Objective knowledge can be communicated directly. Direct communication consists of statements that can be communicated and understood without appropriation, that is, without experiencing personally what is being communicated. While the one who sees himself in existence is engaged subjectively, as it appears to the one fleeing, he seems to be in charge of his own destiny, instead anonymous forces of society is the one choosing for him (in the current hegemony). Kierkegaard personifies an attitude with the average citizen. This is an individual who is unconsciously fleeing from the opportunity to live an authentic life. This average citizen often appears as morally superior to others, but really this is an unreflected individual. The individual are being swallowed up by social norms and others expectations, without even being aware of this. The result is that the individual becomes alienated, both from himselves and the society. An individuals values must be the result of an existential awareness. The important thing is to preserve the independence and responsibility in interacting with other people, and its precisely this ability the character never did develop. (Matthew 22:39.)

Still there is a widespread misunderstanding that there is an obvious correlation between knowledge and wisdom. When people from within a movement becomes alienated, they are barely corresponding to reality. Moving from subjective to objective, to a certain kind of movement, dealing with philosophical speculations. Somehow they call it science. And now they even claim philosophy to be dead. And it all boils down to what seeks to alienate us, that is what comes in between decent people. It is widely believed that Gods existence neither can be proved nor disproved. The problem occurs when people becomes alienated from themselves and the society, trying to prove otherwise. Although there are many, or probably more of the real (and humble) kind of science people, this kind seeks to alienate us. Like political correctness, it manifests itself more as a form of behavior control rather than an effort to remedy the problems it ostensibly seeks to address. And with that, objectivism has totally falsified our conception of truth, by exalting what we can know and prove, while covering up with ambiguous utterances all that we know and cannot prove, even though the latter knowledge underlies, and must ultimately set its seal to, all that we can prove (Michael Polanyi). The belief that all of reality can be fully comprehended in terms of logic and rational thought is clearly not the case. Rationalists often say they acknowledge human limits and learn what they can within those limits. Well, the idea that the universe came out of “nothing” — it arose as a quantum fluctuation with literally no pre-existing state. No space, no time, no laws of nature, no anything, requires the greatest leap of faith in human history. Is that what it is all about, being rational and everything? In fact very little of the supposed mechanisms of how the universe came into existence spontaneously is published in scientific journals, instead, atheist scientists write their thoughts on the subject in popular-level books, presenting not tested science. It’s a philosophical speculation, which they apparently believes is so compelling they dont have to give any specification of evidence. Atheists, normally they need evidence, but science seeks to control. Well, you can’t get any evidence about what existed before space and time came into being. Sadly by now this kind have become just as dogmatic and fundamentalistic in their beliefs as the very notion of what is considered to be criticized. And just by the exalting of it, evolution becomes not an argument against God, it is just another process on earth. And its all about the origin of life, a scientific problem which is not yet been solved. Around 96 per cent of matter and energy are in forms that we cannot directly detect. Dark energy is the most accepted hypothesis to explain the observations indicating that the universe is expanding at an accelerating rate, but they really have no idea what dark energy is. Nor do they understand Dark matter. Yet for many people today, dark matter and dark energy are every bit as real as what we can see. And its not possible to test hypotheses beyond the observable universe, its total size, age, the existence of parallel universes (multiverse) and similar ideas. lets face it, we dont know anything about the universe in the grand scheme of things. It is arrogant for modern man to assume any different. And according to genuine science, they may be able to discover the limits of quantum theory in the next decade or two. Einstein in particular never quite accepted it. ‘It seems hard to sneak a look at God’s cards,’ he wrote to a colleague, ‘but that he plays dice and uses “telepathic” methods (as the present quantum theory requires of him) is something that I cannot believe for a single moment. Einstein believed as Bell, to accept that quantum theory cannot be a complete fundamental theory of nature. The more science uncover ‘facts,’ the more they realize we do not know and the gap only gets bigger. Perhaps Kant, Kierkegaard and others had right, and what we think we know may simply reflect the categories of the human mind. We can perhaps only deal with things as they appear to us. How things are in themselves may forever be beyond our grasp. The bigger picture always goes deeper than rationality. Rationalists believe reality has an intrinsically logical structure. But according to the logical assumptions that science rests on, the notion of an infinite universe is impossible. Not only has science limits, but reason is a dead–end. In a three-dimensional reality such as ours, a limitation of the dimensions in any direction is a contradiction, there will always be something behind. Which well proves that dimensions is a purely subjective phenomenon. One should therefore reject all theories regarding infinite and rather use it purely subjective. And through the recognition of the irrational present, the door opens for the recognition of other paradoxes. Infinite is a knowledge of the unknown, eternal truth and the larger picture which transcends rationality, given rise to the sense of a world forever beyond our grasp. Theres a difference in believing in science and being stuck in it. Faith in reason is simply being idealistic. And that is the reason the very authors now claim philosophy to be dead, it offers a threat to this kind of enterprise.

Christian existentialism is a theo-philosophical movement which takes an existentialist approach to Christian theology

March 6th

Christian existentialism is a theo-philosophical movement which takes an existentialist approach to Christian theology. The school of thought is often traced back to the work of the Danish philosopher and theologian Søren Kierkegaard (1813–1855), who is considered the father of existentialism. Philosophy introduces us to the very essence of life. «Has science lost its love for wisdom?» They say human consciousness is higher, and do not fit nature. Man strives towards justice and meaning that cannot be achieved - and therefore humanity needs what nature cannot provide. Is it then natural to seek meaning beyond nature and rationality?

There are differences between thinkers that can be classified as existentialists, but still they all claim that reality is partly absurd; it can't be understood only with the use of reason, and that one therefore must use non-rational methods such as faith, feelings, intuition, desire, will, etc. The human inability to find intrinsic value – to seek a higher or deeper purpose in life – is the rational mind brought up believing we're entirely rational beings. The absurdity in existence itself has no meaning, and we must learn to bear with it. That is simply because we are inexperienced. In the end it adds up to subjective truth – which cannot be directly understood. Indirect communication requires appropriation on the part of the receiver. The receiver must experience to understand. Or else it occurs as limitations within the language, leading to misunderstanding and people who criticize others for their own lack of understanding. Subjective truth is composed by introspection and experiences, not propositions or perceptions of the external world. History, science, and speculative philosophy – all deal with objective knowledge, which can be communicated directly and understood without experiencing personally what is being communicated. And for those entirely rational beings, actually they are living in denial. People operate using two separate systems for information processing: analytical-rational and intuitive-experiential. The analytical-rational system for information processing, is covered by the intuitive-experiential, which is fast, guided by emotion and past experience, requires little in terms of cognitive resources, it is especially equipped to handle the majority of information processing on a daily basis. Because you trust and believe in your intuition, it allows us to focus the limited capacity of our rational system on whatever requires our conscious attention at the time. And that's the very same thing as admitting to how false it is thinking we are entirely rational creatures. With that, your intuition is the typical compass. And often do we know what to do, but then don't do it. And that's simply being practical. Being practical is not the same thing as truth. Which means your intuition was giving you a sense of direction. Chess players depend on intuition. Magnus Carlsen says, "it’s hard to explain, sometimes a move just feels right." Engaging in deliberate practice – we aren’t just accumulating factual knowledge. Instead, we’re embedding our experience into our unconscious, so that even insanely complicated calculations can be made possible. Intuition is an essential capacity for Genius. Experts are actually profoundly intuitive. When experts evaluate a situation, they don't deliberately evaluate all the available options or analyze all the relevant information. And in crisis situations, armed forces, police, fire brigade, hospitals, etc. The analytical-rational is primarily for the inexperienced. Most of us can develop an intuitive decision style by gaining experience. Lack of experience is the reason nothing ever is reasonable enough to some people. And now they are doing nothing else than encouraging others to think more rationally. Actually, people have been doing this for centuries, in contrast to a rational sense which are guiding people from the inside, enabling them to set a good example.

While objective facts are important, there is a second and more crucial element of truth, which is to be found in subjectivity. Objective truth is that which relates to propositions, that which has no relation to the existence of the knower. Objective knowledge can be communicated directly. Direct communication consists of statements that can be communicated and understood without appropriation, that is, without experiencing personally what is being communicated. While the one who "sees himself in existence" is engaged subjectively, as it appears to the one fleeing, he seems to be in charge of his own destiny, instead anonymous forces of society is the one choosing for him (in the current hegemony). Kierkegaard personifies an attitude with the average citizen. This is an individual who is unconsciously fleeing from the opportunity to live an authentic life. This average citizen often appears as "morally superior" to others, but really this is an unreflected individual. The individual are being swallowed up by social norms and others expectations, without even being aware of this. The result is that the individual becomes alienated, both from himselves and the society. An individual's values must be the result of an "existential awareness." The important thing is to preserve the independence and responsibility in interacting with other people, and it's precisely this ability the character never did develop. (Matthew 22:39.)

Still there is a widespread misunderstanding that there is an obvious correlation between knowledge and wisdom. When people from within a movement becomes alienated, they are barely corresponding to reality. Moving from subjective to objective, to a certain kind of movement, dealing with philosophical speculations. Somehow they call it science. And now they even claim philosophy to be dead. And it all boils down to what seeks to alienate us, that is what comes in between decent people. It is widely believed that God's existence neither can be proved nor disproved. The problem occurs when people becomes alienated from themselves and the society, trying to prove otherwise. Although there are many, or probably more of the real (and humble) kind of science people, this kind seeks to alienate us. Like political correctness, it manifests itself more as a form of behavior control rather than an effort to remedy the problems it ostensibly seeks to address. And with that, objectivism has totally falsified our conception of truth, by exalting what we can know and prove, while covering up with ambiguous utterances all that we know and cannot prove, even though the latter knowledge underlies, and must ultimately set its seal to, all that we can prove (Michael Polanyi). The belief that all of reality can be fully comprehended in terms of logic and rational thought is clearly not the case. Rationalists often say they acknowledge human limits and learn what they can within those limits. Well, the idea that the universe came out of “nothing” — it arose as a quantum fluctuation with literally no pre-existing state. No space, no time, no laws of nature, no anything, requires the greatest leap of faith in human history. Is that what it is all about, being rational and everything? In fact very little of the supposed mechanisms of how the universe came into existence spontaneously is published in scientific journals, instead, atheist scientists write their thoughts on the subject in popular-level books, presenting not tested science. It’s a philosophical speculation, which they apparently believes is so compelling they dont have to give any specification of evidence. Atheists, normally they need evidence, but science seeks to control. Well, you can’t get any evidence about what existed before space and time came into being. Sadly by now this kind have become just as dogmatic and fundamentalistic in their beliefs as the very notion of what is considered to be criticized. And just by the exalting of it, evolution becomes not an argument against God, it is just another process on earth. And it's all about the origin of life, a scientific problem which is not yet been solved. Around 96 per cent of matter and energy are in forms that we cannot directly detect. Dark energy is the most accepted hypothesis to explain the observations indicating that the universe is expanding at an accelerating rate, but they really have no idea what dark energy is. Nor do they understand Dark matter. Yet for many people today, dark matter and dark energy are every bit as real as what we can see. And it's not possible to test hypotheses beyond the observable universe, its total "size", age, the existence of parallel universes (multiverse) and similar ideas. let's face it, we don't know anything about the universe in the grand scheme of things. It is arrogant for modern man to assume any different. And according to genuine science, they may be able to discover the limits of quantum theory in the next decade or two. Einstein in particular never quite accepted it. ‘It seems hard to sneak a look at God’s cards,’ he wrote to a colleague, ‘but that he plays dice and uses “telepathic” methods (as the present quantum theory requires of him) is something that I cannot believe for a single moment. Einstein believed as Bell, to accept that quantum theory cannot be a complete fundamental theory of nature. The more science uncover ‘facts,’ the more they realize we do not know and the gap only gets bigger. Perhaps Kant, Kierkegaard and others had right, and what we think we know may simply reflect the categories of the human mind. We can perhaps only deal with things as they appear to us. How things are in themselves may forever be beyond our grasp. The bigger picture always goes deeper than rationality. Rationalists believe reality has an intrinsically logical structure. But according to the logical assumptions that science rests on, the notion of an infinite universe is impossible. Not only has science limits, but reason is a dead–end. In a three-dimensional reality such as ours, a limitation of the dimensions in any direction is a contradiction, there will always be something behind. Which well proves that dimensions is a purely subjective phenomenon. One should therefore reject all "theories" regarding infinite and rather use it purely subjective. And through the recognition of the irrational present, the door opens for the recognition of other paradoxes. Infinite is a knowledge of the unknown, eternal truth and the larger picture which transcends rationality, given rise to the sense of a world forever beyond our grasp. There's a difference in believing in science and being stuck in it. Faith in reason is simply being idealistic. And that is the reason the very authors now claim philosophy to be dead, it offers a threat to this kind of enterprise.
... See MoreSee Less

Christian existentialism is a theo-philosophical movement which takes an existentialist approach to Christian theology. The school of thought is often traced back to the work of the Danish philosopher and theologian Søren Kierkegaard (1813–1855), who is considered the father of existentialism. Philosophy introduces us to the very essence of life. «Has science lost its love for wisdom?» They say human consciousness is higher, and do not fit nature. Man strives towards justice and meaning that cannot be achieved - and therefore humanity needs what nature cannot provide. Is it then natural to seek meaning beyond nature and rationality?

There are differences between thinkers that can be classified as existentialists, but still they all claim that reality is partly absurd; it cant be understood only with the use of reason, and that one therefore must use non-rational methods such as faith, feelings, intuition, desire, will, etc. The human inability to find intrinsic value – to seek a higher or deeper purpose in life – is the rational mind brought up believing were entirely rational beings. The absurdity in existence itself has no meaning, and we must learn to bear with it. That is simply because we are inexperienced. In the end it adds up to subjective truth – which cannot be directly understood. Indirect communication requires appropriation on the part of the receiver. The receiver must experience to understand. Or else it occurs as limitations within the language, leading to misunderstanding and people who criticize others for their own lack of understanding. Subjective truth is composed by introspection and experiences, not propositions or perceptions of the external world. History, science, and speculative philosophy – all deal with objective knowledge, which can be communicated directly and understood without experiencing personally what is being communicated. And for those entirely rational beings, actually they are living in denial. People operate using two separate systems for information processing: analytical-rational and intuitive-experiential. The analytical-rational system for information processing, is covered by the intuitive-experiential, which is fast, guided by emotion and past experience, requires little in terms of cognitive resources, it is especially equipped to handle the majority of information processing on a daily basis. Because you trust and believe in your intuition, it allows us to focus the limited capacity of our rational system on whatever requires our conscious attention at the time. And thats the very same thing as admitting to how false it is thinking we are entirely rational creatures. With that, your intuition is the typical compass. And often do we know what to do, but then dont do it. And thats simply being practical. Being practical is not the same thing as truth. Which means your intuition was giving you a sense of direction. Chess players depend on intuition. Magnus Carlsen says, it’s hard to explain, sometimes a move just feels right. Engaging in deliberate practice – we aren’t just accumulating factual knowledge. Instead, we’re embedding our experience into our unconscious, so that even insanely complicated calculations can be made possible. Intuition is an essential capacity for Genius. Experts are actually profoundly intuitive. When experts evaluate a situation, they dont deliberately evaluate all the available options or analyze all the relevant information. And in crisis situations, armed forces, police, fire brigade, hospitals, etc. The analytical-rational is primarily for the inexperienced. Most of us can develop an intuitive decision style by gaining experience. Lack of experience is the reason nothing ever is reasonable enough to some people. And now they are doing nothing else than encouraging others to think more rationally. Actually, people have been doing this for centuries, in contrast to a rational sense which are guiding people from the inside, enabling them to set a good example. 

While objective facts are important, there is a second and more crucial element of truth, which is to be found in subjectivity. Objective truth is that which relates to propositions, that which has no relation to the existence of the knower. Objective knowledge can be communicated directly. Direct communication consists of statements that can be communicated and understood without appropriation, that is, without experiencing personally what is being communicated. While the one who sees himself in existence is engaged subjectively, as it appears to the one fleeing, he seems to be in charge of his own destiny, instead anonymous forces of society is the one choosing for him (in the current hegemony). Kierkegaard personifies an attitude with the average citizen. This is an individual who is unconsciously fleeing from the opportunity to live an authentic life. This average citizen often appears as morally superior to others, but really this is an unreflected individual. The individual are being swallowed up by social norms and others expectations, without even being aware of this. The result is that the individual becomes alienated, both from himselves and the society. An individuals values must be the result of an existential awareness. The important thing is to preserve the independence and responsibility in interacting with other people, and its precisely this ability the character never did develop. (Matthew 22:39.)

Still there is a widespread misunderstanding that there is an obvious correlation between knowledge and wisdom. When people from within a movement becomes alienated, they are barely corresponding to reality. Moving from subjective to objective, to a certain kind of movement, dealing with philosophical speculations. Somehow they call it science. And now they even claim philosophy to be dead. And it all boils down to what seeks to alienate us, that is what comes in between decent people. It is widely believed that Gods existence neither can be proved nor disproved. The problem occurs when people becomes alienated from themselves and the society, trying to prove otherwise. Although there are many, or probably more of the real (and humble) kind of science people, this kind seeks to alienate us. Like political correctness, it manifests itself more as a form of behavior control rather than an effort to remedy the problems it ostensibly seeks to address. And with that, objectivism has totally falsified our conception of truth, by exalting what we can know and prove, while covering up with ambiguous utterances all that we know and cannot prove, even though the latter knowledge underlies, and must ultimately set its seal to, all that we can prove (Michael Polanyi). The belief that all of reality can be fully comprehended in terms of logic and rational thought is clearly not the case. Rationalists often say they acknowledge human limits and learn what they can within those limits. Well, the idea that the universe came out of “nothing” — it arose as a quantum fluctuation with literally no pre-existing state. No space, no time, no laws of nature, no anything, requires the greatest leap of faith in human history. Is that what it is all about, being rational and everything? In fact very little of the supposed mechanisms of how the universe came into existence spontaneously is published in scientific journals, instead, atheist scientists write their thoughts on the subject in popular-level books, presenting not tested science. It’s a philosophical speculation, which they apparently believes is so compelling they dont have to give any specification of evidence. Atheists, normally they need evidence, but science seeks to control. Well, you can’t get any evidence about what existed before space and time came into being. Sadly by now this kind have become just as dogmatic and fundamentalistic in their beliefs as the very notion of what is considered to be criticized. And just by the exalting of it, evolution becomes not an argument against God, it is just another process on earth. And its all about the origin of life, a scientific problem which is not yet been solved. Around 96 per cent of matter and energy are in forms that we cannot directly detect. Dark energy is the most accepted hypothesis to explain the observations indicating that the universe is expanding at an accelerating rate, but they really have no idea what dark energy is. Nor do they understand Dark matter. Yet for many people today, dark matter and dark energy are every bit as real as what we can see. And its not possible to test hypotheses beyond the observable universe, its total size, age, the existence of parallel universes (multiverse) and similar ideas. lets face it, we dont know anything about the universe in the grand scheme of things. It is arrogant for modern man to assume any different. And according to genuine science, they may be able to discover the limits of quantum theory in the next decade or two. Einstein in particular never quite accepted it. ‘It seems hard to sneak a look at God’s cards,’ he wrote to a colleague, ‘but that he plays dice and uses “telepathic” methods (as the present quantum theory requires of him) is something that I cannot believe for a single moment. Einstein believed as Bell, to accept that quantum theory cannot be a complete fundamental theory of nature. The more science uncover ‘facts,’ the more they realize we do not know and the gap only gets bigger. Perhaps Kant, Kierkegaard and others had right, and what we think we know may simply reflect the categories of the human mind. We can perhaps only deal with things as they appear to us. How things are in themselves may forever be beyond our grasp. The bigger picture always goes deeper than rationality. Rationalists believe reality has an intrinsically logical structure. But according to the logical assumptions that science rests on, the notion of an infinite universe is impossible. Not only has science limits, but reason is a dead–end. In a three-dimensional reality such as ours, a limitation of the dimensions in any direction is a contradiction, there will always be something behind. Which well proves that dimensions is a purely subjective phenomenon. One should therefore reject all theories regarding infinite and rather use it purely subjective. And through the recognition of the irrational present, the door opens for the recognition of other paradoxes. Infinite is a knowledge of the unknown, eternal truth and the larger picture which transcends rationality, given rise to the sense of a world forever beyond our grasp. Theres a difference in believing in science and being stuck in it. Faith in reason is simply being idealistic. And that is the reason the very authors now claim philosophy to be dead, it offers a threat to this kind of enterprise.

Published on 4:16 am

Class 1999 - 2000 Diamond  #Flashback

Class 1999 - 2000 Diamond #Flashback

June 13th

Class 1999 - 2000 Diamond #Flashback ... See MoreSee Less

Class 1999 - 2000 Diamond  #Flashback

Published on 9:37 am

good morning mam may iknow if you have still an office in your branch in lahug? thanks

March 30th

good morning mam may iknow if you have still an office in your branch in lahug? thanks ... See MoreSee Less

Load more


Place Categories: Colleges and Private UniversitiesPlace Tags: University of Southern Philippines and USPF

Rating

0 /5


0 /5 based on 0 user reviews.

Enter Your Location

No Records Found

Sorry, no records were found. Please adjust your search criteria and try again.

Report this?

Send To Friend

Send Enquiry

Claim Listing

What is the claim process?

ASSURE YOUR FUTURE AND JOIN NOW
Entranceuniversity